Airevac is gone and now they are going to present a proposal
to terminate their lease to the city council on Monday night. The city spent
tens of thousands of dollars to put Airevac on the airport and now the revenue
from Airevac is gone and there is not enough fixed wing tenants to support the
airport let alone to make up for the Airevac project. All this is due to the closure plan by the
city.
The city should reimburse the airport for these expenses.
I have been contacted by other airport supporters around the
country that are following the St. Clair closure issue. I am told by these people that it seems these
other airport sponsors are reading the local news publication and using the St.
Clair plan of airport destruction to seek closure for their airport. The FAA is tasked by congress to prevent
this, and the pursuit of this option for a closure, has gained the scrutiny of
the FAA. It appears that the city chose
this option with little or no knowledge of airport operating rules and
regulations, and with the thinking that no one would notice if they did this a
little bit at a time. Fly under the
radar so to speak.
From the closure
CLOSURE DOCUMENTATION: ST. CLAIR REGIONAL AIRPORT
The City of St. Clair is taking the
bold initiative to obtain a release from grant obligations. It is anticipated
that other communities will move in a similar fashion.
Federal agency adherence to policies
that were well intentioned 40 years ago are misplaced today. Both federal and
state governments need to implement smaller, less
costly and more accountable programs.
It is imperative that federal and state
legislators, the agencies that they
oversee, and those that carry out the relevant
regulations recognize this imbalance
and take responsible action, especially in view of
current economic conditions that are
not projected to return to "normal" levels for
several years. Let the City of St.
Clair, Missouri in the heartland of the United States be
the test case. The City is ready to
negotiate a fair settlement of the issue. If not now,
when?
Instead of a “test case”, the city had better hope that it
does not become “an example of”, instead.
No comments:
Post a Comment